Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Efficacy of the combination of cyclosporine and sodium hyaluronate eye drops on dry eye syndrome

Lei Shen, Nana Zhao, Xue Wang, Shuyan Qing

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian Hospital, Suqian 223800, China;

For correspondence:-  Shuyan Qing   Email: qshuyan0505@126.com

Accepted: 3 January 2024        Published: 30 January 2024

Citation: Shen L, Zhao N, Wang X, Qing S. Efficacy of the combination of cyclosporine and sodium hyaluronate eye drops on dry eye syndrome. Trop J Pharm Res 2024; 23(1):1173-124 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v23i1.15

© 2024 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and adverse effect of cyclosporine combined with sodium hyaluronate (SH) eye drops on dry eye syndrome (DES).
Methods: 148 patients with DES treated in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group Suqian Hospital, Jiangsu Province, China between January 2022 and February 2023 were randomly assigned to control (70 cases) and study groups (78 cases). Control group was treated with SH eye drop (1 drop each on both eyes 5 - 6 times a day, for 2 months), while study group was treated with both SH (the same dosage and use with control group) and cyclosporine eye drop (1 - 2 drops each for both eyes, 4 - 6 times a day, for two months). Tear film stability indices such as schirmer I test (SIT), tear break-up time (BUT) and corneal fluorescein stain (FL) of both groups were analyzed before and after therapy.
Results: There was no significant difference in BUT, SIT and FL score between the two groups before treatment. Compared with before treatment, BUT and SIT increased significantly (p < 0.05), while FL score dropped significantly in both groups after treatment (p < 0.05). After treatment, study group showed significantly higher BUT and SIT levels, and significantly lower FL score than control group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The combination of cyclosporine eye drops with SH eye drops is effective in treating DES. This combination regimen protects tear film stability, effectively alleviates DES symptoms, improves ocular surface and meibomian gland function, and also increases lacrimal river height, without increasing adverse reactions. Further studies will be required, to provide more evidence for clinical application of this combination regimen.

Keywords: Cyclosporine eye drop, Sodium hyaluronate eye drop, Dry eye syndrome, Efficacy, Adverse reactions

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates